Who is charlie kaufman

But it was among the most critically adored films of the year. No one really wants me to do that. It would be easier if I wrote the kind of film Christopher Nolan wanted to do. He is unreserved in his enthusiasm for the streaming giant and dismissive of those who see it as the annihilator of cinema. Adaptation was made by Sony.

They would never make a movie like that now. He is equally enthusiastic about our own Jessie Buckley, who replaced Brie Larson in the picture.

It seems more likely Netflix will take it to Toronto or Venice in the autumn. Before that he is looking forward to the publication of his first novel, Antland, and, of course, his imminent visit to the Dublin International Film Festival.

I am always looking for work. The two also worked together on the TV series Prosperity. Directed by Peter Mackie Burns, it stars Tom Vaughan-Lawlor as a Dubliner who sparks an unlikely relationship at a time of great personal stress. Please update your payment details to keep enjoying your Irish Times subscription. Donald Clarke. Now years-old, Charlie Kaufman still exhibits a bit of that social reticence. More from The Irish Times Music.

Home energy upgrades are now more important than ever. Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber. The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment. You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards. Screen Name Selection. Only letters, numbers, periods and hyphens are allowed in screen names. Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Your Comments. Sign In Sign Out. It makes my frame of reference larger and more complex than my concerns with my own issues. That willingness to pull focus makes Kaufman an intellectual pleasure but, it should be said, a slightly frustrating interviewee. For instance, B is a sort of parodic extreme of film-nerdery — forever drawing up top lists consisting of ultra-obscure experimental foreign-language films and inveighing against rival critics.

Do critics bug Kaufman? This Apatow thing is hard to read. Or is it chosen because Apatow — as seems equally possible — represents everything Kaufman detests about modern cinema? You can take from it what you want. Then there are the cultural politics of the book. The pronouns issue is a particularly hot topic. Was Kaufman worried that it would look as if he was making fun of trans rights? You know, always worried about everything but it is what it is. Kaufman declines to address the question.

Like his films, it gleefully unravels any sense of a stable reality. It scared me too much. This thing that people say is my style They're absurdist, I guess. It got attention and people liked it, but it was weird, and it dealt with sexuality that was questionable for television at the time.

And it didn't feel like a sitcom — it wasn't naturalistic. It was sort of theatrical. I also wrote something called Rambling Pants, which was a pilot about a poet, a travelling poet whose name is Pants. He was a very bad poet, but he doesn't know that. He travels the country and gets into different kinds of adventures — again, pretty silly. And that one has a lot of singing in it.

People break into song way too much in that one — like every fourth or fifth line. And I wrote something for HBO which was about a relationship. I wanted to follow this relationship from its inception, but it's sort of anti-romantic — it's a couple in this sort of a gridlock situation, where people are together but there's never really any clear reason why. And it was called In Limbo. While waiting for more work after one of the sitcoms he wrote for was cancelled, Kaufman started writing a film script that began as "a story about a man who falls in love with someone who is not his wife.

Reportedly Kaufman selected the latter for several reasons, including the fact he is a gifted actor as well as for the lilt of his name which, when repeated frequently, can seem hilarious. I never thought anyone was going to make it. Then Malkovich read it and liked it, which I was very happy about, and I thought that was as far as it was going to go. And it was, for a couple of years. Then it kind of came together.

Then the company owned by R. M's Michael Stipe bought the script and things began to move. Spike Jonze, previously known for only his music videos and TV commercials, signed on to direct the film. The cast, including Catherine Keener, John Cusack and Cameron Diaz, all got on board because of the originality of the material. As Diaz described it, "they say in Hollywood there are only 14 scripts.

Well this is number From its initial screenings, Being John Malkovich generated positive buzz and its inclusion at various film festivals before its theatrical release led to its cachet. Portraying the inner mind of Malkovich is one thing; cerebral cinema is another. But there is a lesson to learn from watching his work. In Human Nature a coquettish Patricia Arquette portrays a sexy siren with animal instincts, as electrically charged as the electrologist Rosie Perez who treats her.

Written the year after Malkovich — again after one of the shows he worked on was cancelled — the film was met with an indifferent reception, not helped by minimal publicity and a limited theatrical run. Adaptation fared much better with critics and fans alike. Using Susan Orlean's The Orchid Thief as a starting point, it blurs the line between fact and fiction in telling the parallel tales of Kaufman's own struggle to adapt Orlean's book, and the tale of Orlean herself, writing about orchid thief John Laroche.

Once his career took off, Kaufman invited Paul Proch to submit material that he'd pass along to his agent, and they collaborated again shortly after Adaptation. Proch recalls, "There was an old screenplay we tried to rewrite for HBO when they asked him to do a series. It was just too crazy. We were gonna do a fake documentary about this guy making this film. They turned it down, and then they did Project Greenlight. Ours was more interesting. I don't feel too bad, because they turned down Mulholland Drive, too.

Confessions of a Dangerous Mind brought to the big screen Chuck Barris' "unauthorized autobiography", wherein the real-life former gameshow host claims to have worked as a CIA assassin while simultaneously chaperoning Dating Game contestants around the world and introducing the masses to a variety of questionably-talented folks via The Gong Show.

Directed by George Clooney, starring Sam Rockwell, Drew Barrymore, Julia Roberts and Clooney himself, the star power and Barris' claims ensured the film was "highly-anticipated" according to critics Unlike all the previous films, Charlie didn't work with the director, and reportedly some re-writes were done by Clooney himself. The final cut did not impress Charlie, who disliked the "aren't-I-cute" tone of the movie.

March saw the wide release of Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, an original script based on an idea given to Charlie by a friend of the film's director Michel Gondry. This is the film that finally won Charlie an Oscar, after previous nominations for Adaptation and Being John Malkovich.

In Kaufman's words, the romantic comedy was "about this guy [played by Jim Carrey] who finds out that his girlfriend of two years [Kate Winslet] has had this surgical procedure which has erased him from her memory. So he's freaked out and trying to live with it and he can't, so he decides to have the same procedure.

Most of the movie takes place in his brain as she's being erased, and you see their whole relationship, moment-by-moment, backwards from this sort of bad end to the better beginning. Halfway through, as the memories start getting better, he decides he doesn't want the procedure.

The film was arguably the most positively-reviewed movie of , making it into the top half of almost every Top 10 list that year.